MY MENU

JAPA

본 기사 번역 제공은 <한양대학교 HK 러시아 유라시아 연구사업단>이 러시아 및 유라시아 지역의 주요 헤드라인 뉴스들을 정리, 번역하여 매주 국가별로 원문과 함께 제공하는 ‘주간뉴스 번역서비스’이다. 2010년 7월 20일 제 1호가 나온 이후 지금에 이르며, 본 기사번역 제공서비스가 포괄하는 국가에는 러시아연방을 비롯하여, 우크라이나, 벨라루스, 몰도바, 카자흐스탄, 우즈베키스탄, 키르기스스탄, 투르크메니스탄, 타지키스탄, 아제르바이잔, 아르메니아, 조지아 등 12개 국가이다. 이들 12개국에서 벌어지는 생생한 최신뉴스를 엄선하여 번역하고 원문링크와 함께 배포하는 본 서비스는 이제 관련 전문가들은 물론이고, 학생들에게도 학술적 가치를 인정받고 있다.

지난 1990년 「월간북방동향」으로 창간하여 1997년 「아태지역동향」으로 제호를 변경한 이래 2006년 2월호까지 발간되었다. 본지는 월간 발행을 원칙으로 하고 있으며, 게재되는 내용은 본 아태지역연구센터에서 매월 개최하고 있는 중국, 러시아, 북한, 미국, 일본 5개국의 정치/경제/사회 동향 및 초점분석에 대한 월례보고회의 결과물들이다.

『JAPA(Journal of Asia-Pacific Affairs』는 본 연구센터의 확대개편에 따라 연구영역의 확장을 꾀하고자 발간된 영문 학술잡지로서 지난 1999년 8월 창간호가 발행되었다. 본 학술잡지는 연 2회 발행되어 아시아-태평양지역 주요 국가들에 대한 연구성과를 게재하였는데, 2006년 7월호(v.7, n.7) 이후 발간이 중단되었다.

「亞太쟁점과 연구」 (Contemporary Asia-Pacific Studies)는 월간 「아태지역동향」을 확대, 발전시켜 2006년 4월에 그 창간호가 나온 계간지이다. 본 연구지는 아태지역연구센터의 내 · 외부 연구진들이 아시아-태평양 지역의 현안 쟁점들을 논의하는 워크숍에서 발표된 연구논문 working paper를 묶어 계간으로 발간하는 형태를 취하고 있으며, 2007년 겨울 (제 2권, 4호, 통권 8호)를 마지막으로 발간이 중단되었다.

제목

JAPA : Volume 3

작성자
관리자
작성일
2012.04.23
첨부파일0
기간(년)
2001
기간(월)
내용



Volume 3 No. 1


Integration to the Chinese Society: Korean Minority in China During the Campaign Period(1957-1978)

*Abstract :
This article describes the assimilation policy of the Chinese Communists towards Korean minority in China during the period of campaigns(1957-1978). It argues that this assimilation policy was the basis of China's policy towards her ethnic minorities. It further argues that it was rooted in Chinese nationalism which embraced facets of Sinocentrism. During the period, official Government policy towards the Chosonjok(Korean minority in China) ceased. Instead, other institutions led by Han Chinese took over policy making. The policies were an assimilation into Han Chinese culture based on annihilation of the ethnic identity of Chosonjok. Before 1957, Chinese government policy did not have much impact on the local level of the Korean community. However, through the campaigns, Korean ethnic identity was endangered and the Korean community was in peril. (123 words)


Socioeconomic and Political Factors on the Emergence of a Social Pact in South Korea


*Abstract :
As an alternative for facilitating economic structural adjustment, a social pact for coalition-building among economic actors emerged under the Kim Dae Jung government in South Korea. This article examines what factors affected the emergence of a social pact in South Korea. Previous studies have focused on formal representative institutions like political parties and congress as the independent variables. This article tests the conventional wisdom about the institutional preconditions for successful social pacts in South Korea. From the findings, this article argues that a social pact in South Korea emerged as the results of multi-level institutional contexts, including economic crisis, government's pro-labor characteristics, social linkages between political and labor leaders, and the weak organizational strength of the bargaining partners.


 Agricultural Reform in North Korea: Decollectivization?


*Astract : North Korean agricultural reform of moving away from collective farming has already begun. The government formally approves the formation of family unit farms deviated from the unit management structure of the collective farms while informally acknowledging the development of the farmers market, which is found in a free market. In addition, the concept of independent profit-making unit is uprising, and changes are visible even in the sacred Juche farming. Furthermore, farming in North Korea has been exposed to winds of change from South Korea and overseas countries. As such, the North Korean agricultural reform can be understood as a reform in collective farming, and the change from the agricultural sector can have contingent effects on the rest of the North Korean society.


The WTO Ruling on the Dispute between Kodak Fujifilm: Three Levels of Analysis


*Astract :
This Paper aims at discussing and analyzing the trade dispute between Kodak and Fuji. For many years, the United States has accused Japan of maintaining a closed market system and of encouraging unfair business activities and noncompetitive practices of Japanese companies. Meanwhile, Japan responded that the U.S. allegations were totally groundless and unacceptable. Japan's intransigence inevitably led Washington to handle the photo film dispute through WTO. WTO embarked upon to deal with this case along with three major criteria: measure of application,  benefit accruing, and nullification and impairment. After one and half years' thorough investigation, WTO finally concluded that the U.S. failed to show adequate evidences on Japan's closed market, which means Japan's victory over the U.S. with respect to this film case.   


The End of the "Aid to Families with Dependent Children": Forces for Change and Implication for U.S. Federalism


*Abstract :
The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 marked a turing point both in U.S. welfare policy and in U.S. federalism. By replacing the Aid to Families with Dependent Children(AFDC) with the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families(TANF), the Act put an end to the AFDC, 61 year-old federal cash assistance to families in need. Under the TANF, the new U.S. welfare policy shifted its emphasis from workfare to welfare and enhanced the role of states. Among other things, long-standing frustration of white middle class Americans against dependency culture and the reform commitment of President Clinton and Republican majority party in the 104th Congress were the major forces behind the 1996 welfare reform. With respect to the future federal-state relationship,  the Act implies that states are permitted to implement their welfare programs with less intervention of the federal government than they used to under the AFDC.


State-Business Relations in South Korea: Symbiotic or Contentious?


*Astract :
This paper rejects the simple assumption of a cozy and symbiotic state-chaebol relationship. It argues that personal ambition for more market shares through diversification, the policies of the former Kim government to distant itself from the chaebol, and pressures from the international economy provide evidence of a less cozy business-state relationship in South Korea. The movement toward diversification in the Korean chaebol in the 1960s and 1970s and subsequent managerial reforms in the 1990s have been the result of the role of culture and market. Diversification was encouraged by the state, but it is likely that such diversification would have naturally occurred without encouragement from the state given the intense personal ambition and competition between chaebol owners. Later, looking at the Samsung Group, we argued that many of the managerial reforms which are occurring within the chaebol have been the result of a changing market heavily influenced by the state and its desire to distance itself from the chaebol and the negative public opinion often associated with the chae





Volume 3 No. 2


How International Diplomacy Failed the People of East Timor
A Study on the Influence of Relative Gains Concerns on Cooperation: The Case Study of the US-Soviet Cooperation in the 1970s
Industrial Cooperation between Korea and Russia: Current Situation and Prospects
North Korea's Education Policy and System, and External Cooperation with International Organizations
Long-Run Linkages of Financial Liberalization among ASEAN Economies: Results from Bounds Testing Approach
The Articulation of State in Coevolutionary Competition: A Case Study of U.S. and Japanese Semiconductor Industry


게시물수정

게시물 수정을 위해 비밀번호를 입력해주세요.

댓글삭제게시물삭제

게시물 삭제를 위해 비밀번호를 입력해주세요.